Thanks to my fellow bloggers I'm up to speed on the BMB (and without the nasty hangover effect of the predictive programming I would have received by watching the coverage of the event all Monday and Tuesday!) and believe the bombing itself relates quite well to Operation Gladio and its sub-operations throughout Europe and the Strategy of State Sponsored Tension:
The 'Tension' angle also ties in with the Occupiers of Palestine, that phony state named 'Israel'. According to the study entitled 'Israel's Sacred Terrorism' by Livia Rokach where she reveals gems from Moshe Sharett's personal diary entries, Israel was practicing the Politics of Tension on Arabs, the Palestinian people, and even jews in Israel. In 1955 Israel's political bosses were concerned with Nasser's overtures of peace and the fact that Nasser was beginning to ingratiate himself with at least some of the political establishment in the US. In an effort to bring peace to the region, the American government offered Israel a security guarantee. In effect, this guarantee was an agreement that the US would 'have Israel's back' if '''that little democracy in the Middle East''' was attacked by outside forces. At the same time Nasser went public with an offer of 'normalizing relations' with Israel. To quote: "In other words, conditions were favorable for a settlement. BUT THE ZIONIST IDEOLOGUES DID NOT WISH A SETTLEMENT. An important consideration in the sequence of events is that the Israeli population was enjoying a growing sense of prosperity and security. This did not suit the Zionist ideologues who believed the people's teeth should be set on edge so that when the opportunity came, the country might be ready for Israel's next move to expand. The immediate territorial target was GAZA. The political objective was to disrupt the growing rapport between the U.S. and Nasser. Sharett's diary, for 5/26/55 records the thinking of some of those who orchestrated Israeli attitudes and also influenced world opinion. The principal spokesman for the opponents of the possible peace was Dayan. And the diary reports:
"We do not need (Dayan said) a security pact with the U.S., such a pact will only constitute an obstacle for us. We face no danger at all of an Arab advantage of force for the next 8-10 years. Even if they receive massive military aid from the west, we shall maintain our military superiority thanks to an infinitely greater capacity to assimilate new armaments. The security pact will only handcuff us and deny us freedom of action, and this is what we need in the coming years. Reprisal raids which we couldn't carry out if we were tied to a security pact are our vital lymph. First (the reprisal raids) make it imperative for the Arab governments to take strong measures to protect the borders. Second, AND THAT'S THE MAIN THING, THEY MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR US TO MAINTAIN A HIGH LEVEL OF TENSION AMONG OUR POPULATION AND THE ARMY. Without these actions we would cease to be a combative people and WITHOUT THE DISCIPLINE OF A COMBATIVE PEOPLE WE ARE LOST....We will have to cry out that the Negev is in danger SO THAT ANGRY MEN WILL GO THERE."
Sharett then adds his own comments:
"The conclusions from Dayan's words are clear. This state has no international worries, no economic problems. THE QUESTION OF PEACE IS NON-EXISTENT. IT must calculate its steps narrow-mindedly AND LIVE ON ITS SWORD. It must see the sword as the main, if not the only instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Towards this end it may, no, IT MUST, INVENT DANGERS AND TO DO THIS IT MUST ADOPT THE METHOD OF PROVOCATION AND REVENGE....and above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally GET RID OF OUR TROUBLES AND ACQUIRE OUR SPACE...Ben Gurion himself said it would be worth while to pay an Arab a million pounds to start a war."
The eternal, Zionist dialectic again! If the people are not obsessed with fear, create conditions to frighten them. If there are no visible enemies - create them! Ignore any hand outstretched in friendship, for the friendship CAN DISSOLVE THE IDEOLOGY.
So in the film at the top of this post and as revealed by Sharett's diary, we know what kind of men push this 'Tension' on the rest of the world. But how does that tie in with the BMB?
As revealed on aangirfan's great blog, we can read a link to an article that appeared in the Telegraph where it is stated:
A recipe for how to make pressure cooker bombs, which investigators say were used in the Boston Marathon attack, was most notoriously published in the Al-Qaeda magazine Inspire. The recipe – along with a rationale for post-9/11 terror – was printed three years ago in Al-Qaeda’s English-language promotional online magazine, Inspire.
In an article, it instructed readers on how, as its headline writers put it, to “Make a bomb in the kitchen of your Mom”.
It gave the types of explosive, timers and other ingredients needed – along with, it said, a pressure cooker.
That article was from the first edition of the magazine. Written in perfect but slightly hysterical English, some thought it was a hoax or satire along the lines of the film “Four Lions”.
Now, who is it again that really created and backed (and is still backing) Al Qaeda? Was it a Muslim caveman? Maybe Muhammad (pbuh) himself? Oh no, that's right. It was these guys.
Look. The 2 bombs that exploded in Boston ignited a couple of hours after the first runners crossed the finish line. They exploded on top of the 'VIP' viewing stand. But only detonated after the VIPs had exited, bound no doubt for a very expensive restaurant. Now were I one of the 'lone nuts' of which we hear and read so often, would I be as stupid as to set my bomb's timer to ring after all the Special People had already moved on? Would my goal be to terrorize normal middle class Americans with my actions or would my goal be to inflict pain and suffering on those who I think bare, even if but a tiny amount, responsibility for the corrupted state of the US and this world? Well, if I were one of those 'lone nuts' I'd damn well seek to inflict my rage on those I believe are most deserving. Were I a lover of the State and War and Tension Politics, I'd go after the 'little people'.
Who is suffering today in Boston?
A few notes:
The title of this blog post is a quote taken from the video clip that accompanies it. It is not my belief that the BMB event signals an 'institutional coup d'etat'; it is my belief that the US suffered its coup in 1963. I would not be surprised to learn, however, that our 'friend in the Mideast' is using events like 911 and the BMB to functionally eliminate remaining pockets of resistance in the US gov't and military (assuming any still exist).
It was my hope to provide a film by Allan Frankovitch entitled 'Operation Gladio' in its entirety to this post. Unfortunately The Internet Archive site is currently down and it is from there that I had planned on obtaining the film. I'll create a follow-up post later today with the inclusion of the film.
Finally, it has come to my attention from 4 individuals who have either emailed or spoken to me directly that for whatever reason comments they have attempted to place on various posts on this blog have been refused. I love comments! I've published every comment I've been left (the ones that got thru to me). So it is distressing to know that for reasons only known to google some comments are being turned away. I've contacted google about the issue to no avail (which no longer surprises me). Thus, anyone unable to leave comments is welcome to email comments in regards to specific blog posts on The Boat Train and rest assured I'll copy/paste them myself to this blog. I'll, of course, leave out your email and identifying info - just sign the comment however you wish and I'll use that as your moniker. Please first try to leave your comment(s) directly on this blog. If unsuccessful, email them to: firstname.lastname@example.org