Monday, February 25, 2013

Iceland Seeks to Defend Its Young

Iceland must be quite the country.  Beautiful scenery, abundant natural renewable energy, terrific fish, and its people clearly have both courage and a handle on the nation's government.  How else to explain Iceland's steely resolve in telling the banking industry to go straight to hell when the banks told the people: "Hey, we made you prosper and now there's a significant amount of debt due and you need to pay it".

Iceland, the first nation to have its banks implode, was the guiding light for the rest of the world in showing other nations exactly where to tell the bankers to stick their 'debt'. 

It is just terribly unfortunate that Ireland and Spain and Greece (and America) and others didn't follow the example set by the Icelandic people. The other nations allowed themselves to be bullied by the banks and their own governments into accepting terms and conditions that are a direct attack on peoples' well being. Whereas those making the threats should have been immediately jailed (or I can think of 1 good use for Obama's drones) for their Terroristic Behaviors, instead the bullies have again been satiated. As with all bullies, the next attack will be even worse.

Now Iceland is taking another stand.  This time against the ever-pervasive pornography industry. Recognizing that porn isn't appropriate for its nation's children (it has no redeeming value for the adults, either) Iceland is seeking to filter the Internet in an attempt to make pornography inaccessible to its young. Who could be against such a stand for the well-being of children? Well, which 'race' of people is most involved in every aspect of the porn industry? While you're pondering the answer, I'll include below a detailed article describing the issue.  (Thank you to Rehmat's World - Link to follow).

Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir’s Social Democratic government is considering banning online-pornography with the introduction of radical internet filters that would block online content. China is already using internet filters to save children and women from the serious damaging effects of pornography. Icelandic Interior Minister Ogmundur Jonasson, the author of the proposed ban, says he believes it will help stop youth from viewing Internet pornography.
“We have to be able to discuss a ban on violent pornography, which we all agree has a very harmful effects on young people and can have a clear link to incidences of violent crime,” Interior Minister Jonasson said.
Iceland has already passed a law that forbids the printing and distribution of pornography, the law excludes the Internet, however.
Israel-propaganda website, BlazingCatFur, criticized the ban proposal. It called Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, “a feminist lesbian”. “The fact that Dubai bans lap dancing for Islamic reasons and Iceland did it for feminist reasons describes the best way possible the synergy between two totalitarian ideologies. The end result is the same,” wrote the ‘Islamophobe’ bigot”.
However, professor Gail Dines (Wheelock College, Boston), an anti-porn activist and author of ’Pornland: How Porn has Hijacked our Sexuality’, doesn’t agree with the BlazingCatFur nerd. She says: “Iceland is taking a very progressive approach that no other democratic country has tried. It is looking at pornography from a new position – from the perspective of the harm it does to the women who appear in it and as a violation of their civil rights,” said she.
Islam goes even further – it calls taking any part in porn field a major sin.
Anne Machon, former British MI5 spy, who believes Israeli Mossad was behind 9/11, told RT that Iceland government might use tools of censorship to block not only pornography, but “whatever they want”. But, then, is not that happening in over dozen European countries where challenging Holocaust in public is a crime punishable with three-year in prison?
Last year, Egyptian government of Dr. Morsi banned “sexually explicit”, which the administrative court under the pro-USrael Hosni Mubarak regime, denounced pornographic content as “venomous and vile”. The move was criticized by secularists and non-Muslims as censor on “personal freedom”.
Israeli propagandists’ problem with Icelanders goes deeper than porn industry, which is totally monopolized by the Jewish elites. Despite the fact, that President Dr. Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson of Iceland since 1996, is married to Dorrit Moussaieff, an Israeli-born Jew. However, Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld, Chairman of Board of Fellows at the , Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, called Icelanders “antisemites” in Op-Ed he wrote for Israeli daily YNet (July 18, 2011) for the country’s support for Hamas and blaming Victor Tchenguiz family (Iranian Jewish billionaire which settled in Israel after 1979 Islamic Revolution) for collapse of the Icelandic bank Kaupthing in 2008.
Nathan Abrams, a Jewish investigative journalist, wrote in the British Jewish Quarterly (2005) that Jews dominate the porn industry. Some of the prominent Jews in American porn industry, reported by Abrams, are; Reuben Sturman, Steven Hirsch, Ron Jeremy, Adam Glasser and Nina Hartley. However, Abrams, protects Jewish porn monopoly by a 2% American Jewish population by saying that large number of Jews in porn industry were motivated for making easy money than being Jewish. Even Abraham Foxman, head of American-Israeli advocacy group, ADL, agreed with Abrams: “Those Jews who enter the pornography industry have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream“.

So wishing to protect children from the dregs of the internet is, according to a jewish magazine, a "...totalitarian ideology." 

And recognizing that jews attempted to terrorize you into turning your nation's wealth over to a specific jewish family and others of similar persuasion is a sign of 'anti-semitism'. 

And the jews in the US who dominate the pornography industry do so because they are '...individuals pursuing the American dream'. 

I'm going to guess here that the Icelandic people really don't give a damn what jews in occupied Palestine have to say about their action. Their children are more important to them than name-calling. 

Again Iceland is the lighthouse in this most terrible of storms... will other Western nations follow her lead? 

The promised link to Rehmat's website:


  1. Masonic Truman and crew a-bombed the two largest clusters of Christianity in Japan. Yes, they did mean to terrorize us into a Cold War. Any cities would have done so, say Tokyo. It just would not do to have Christianity growing in Japan. There's your Masonic Luciferian USA government at work.

    About that Cold War. As Dr. Stan Monteith says, America financed Communism from its inception. Wall Street bankers sent Lower East Side Bolsheviks to Russia with bags of money and diplomatic help to do a revolt. After WW2, Harry Hopkins gave Russia the a-bomb via Alaska (Major Jordan's Diaries) for the Cold War plan.

    USA ambassadors and generals told Dr. Stan that America installed Fidel Castro knowing he was Communist. Actually Fidel was Fascist originally, a small difference, national vs. international socialism. Fidel regularly visited David Rockefeller in NYC, whose daughters visited Fidel in Cuba. Read about these tours in Rockefeller's own memoirs.

    Mahatma Gandhi is a media made saint like Einstein. It would be nice if he were real. Maybe his grandson believes the PR.


  2. Hi, thanks for the comment (for whatever reason blogger put yours in the Spam file so I haven't seen it until now) - of course you intended this comment for the next article: "Buried History #1".

    Castro, it makes some sense that he was approved at some level as, despite the hundreds of attempts on his life (so the story goes) by the CIA he managed to survive yet we see other leaders are lucky to survive a decade if they are unloved by the jewish establishment.

    As for Gandhi, yes, his grandson does believe, as he recounts his early years when he lived with his grandfather. I've read Makow's article (and others of a similar nature) and while he indeed may be another creation it is also possible that he was simply fighting for His version of the truth. Lord knows neither Gandhi himself or his grandson (to my knowledge) have never said a word about the money lenders/Rothschild family (for instance) and that should have been right down Gandhi's strike zone as the Rothschild's have always enjoyed portraying themselves as 'British' and of course the loans have been used to choke the Indian people for some time now.

    All that being said, the grandson was still an interesting speaker and worth an hour.