Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts

Monday, July 1, 2013

Perp Pics

Please note this blog post was updated with 2 photos - one of Ms. Coba and one of Mr. DiLorenzo - on the second of July)

An anonymous commenter responding to this article  stated: 

'If you are from Oregon or Switzerland, does anyone have photos of those members of the boards of directors??? Photos now become very important. Every name that crops up should have a photo. Thanks'



That's a good idea. I'm certain the folks in the following photos are very proud of the big money they earn for their efforts to re-engineer nature. Therefore they deserve recognition whenever possible. So, without further ado, here are your candidates for Humanitarian of the Year:
Syngenta Chairman Michel Demare

Syngenta CEO Michael Mack

Syngenta Vice Chairman Jurg Witmer

Syngenta Board Member Vinita Bali

Syngenta Board Member Stefan Borgas

Syngenta Board Member Gunnar Brock

Syngenta Board Member Eleni Gabre-Madhin

Syngenta Board Member David Lawrence

Syngenta Board Member Eveline Saupper 

Syngenta Board Member jacques Vincent

Syngenta's Basil headquarters, with 'terrorists' climbing on building

Oregon Department of Agriculture's Director, Katy Soba, is owed a mugshot as well for this quote: "...this is the first time someone has deliberately taken the cowardly step of uprooting high value plants growing in our state. Regardless of how one feels about biotechnology, there is no justification for committing these crimes and it is not the kind of behavior we expect to see in Oregon agriculture." Yeah, whatever. Except I can't find a photo of the woman, as strange as that sounds. Additionally it is somewhat difficult to find pics of the people who serve as board members for Oregonians for Food and 
Shelter - the last thing I want to do is misidentify anyone. 

Thanks to a comment left by anon below, your hungry blogger confused Katy's name. Katy COBA, not Soba (that's a bit embarrassing... no, not for her) and, according to the same comment "Oregonians for Food and Shelter is the pet project of attorney John DiLorenzo (also known as "DiLo")"



So, following are photos of each, then onto the proud folks of Monsanto:


Not to be dissin' Ms. Coba... but her education (a BA) is not as extensive as one usually sees in State Director positions. If anyone knows her maiden name, I'd appreciate it in a comment below



John DiLorenzo, Oregonians for Food and Shelter (and a sales tax as this republican has tried to con the people of Oregon into accepting a sales tax to go with our income and property taxes)


Now, let's take a look at those who sit on Monsanto's Board: 




Hugh Grant. 2010 Chief Exec of the year as named by Chief Executive Magazine (I kid you not). 

Pierre Courduroux, CFO

Tom Hartley, VP and Treasurer

Steven Mizell, token brother, VP Human Resources

Nicole Ringenberg, VP and Controller

Gerald Steiner, VP Sustainability and Corporate Affairs

Brett Begemann, President and Chief Commercial Officer

Dr. Robert Fraley, Exec. VP and Chief Technology Officer

Janet Holloway, Senior VP, Chief of Staff and Community Relations

Kerry Preete, Exec VP Global Strategy

David Snively, Exec VP, Secretary and General Counsel























Saturday, June 29, 2013

The Likely Reason Fields Planted With Monsanto's GMO Sugar Beets Were Torched


Just a few weeks ago we learned that Monsanto's gmo'ed wheat seeds miraculously returned to life, a full twelve years after a test planting in 16 states, including Oregon, afterwhich the GMO wheat seeds were 'wholly destroyed'. 

If you recall, Monsanto and its whor  excuse me, 'professors' claimed that the study involved" 'Very rigorous' protocols (that) controlled the work at agricultural research stations", and at the conclusion of the test planting:  
"GM seeds were burned, buried six feet underground or shipped back to Monsanto", said Oregon State University professor Robert Zemetra. Wide "no-plant" areas were maintained around test sites to prevent pollen movement from the GM wheat to other crops. Testing sites were checked two years after the trials for the presence of "volunteer" wheat plants that might have popped up."

The 'risen from the dead' GMO'ed wheat popping up thru the Earth came at a very inopportune time for Monsanto's operations on in Oregon. 

After years of fighting vocal opposition from neighboring organic and small family farmers, buying politicians with their lobbyists and burrowing their way into Oregon State University's crop sciences department; Monsanto finally swayed Oregon's Department of Agriculture this February into allowing GMO'ed canola seeds to be planted in the Wilamette Valley. (more Here)


But since the 'very rigorous protocols' and burning and burying of the wheat seeds and the 'wide no-plant areas' failed miserably to curb Monsanto's dainty and delicate wheat seeds from springing back to life, just last month the Oregon House passed a bill banning canola seeds from the Wilamette Valley for the next five years. Now it remains to be seen if the Senate will in turn approve the bill and pass it on to the governor for signing. (more Here)

Farmers as far away as Kansas are now suing Monsanto for potentially devaluing the wheat they grow and then sell to foreign markets, and an attempt is being made to combine the lawsuits into a Class Action suit. (more Here)

Lost Cree Lake, Jackson County
And now comes word that an 'arsonist(s)' has set alight Monsanto's sugar beet plants that were, until they were torched, growing in SW Oregon's Jackson County. Note it isn't a local arson squad going after the perpetrators, but rather Federal Agents. Is it a federal crime to burn a field of, let's say, corn? I know if someone sets my home alight not to expect agents to come running from D.C. to solve the crime. But again, we live in a fascist state where corporations run the government and we the idiots foot the bill. Just as curious, why is it that this 'crime' that reportedly took place in 'early June' is only being reported on now, nearly a month after the fact? (By the way, I don't know the answer to this question, yet)


Federal investigators are asking the public to help solve middle-of-the-night crimes that left ruined fields of genetically engineered sugar beets in rural Jackson County.

The crop destruction took place over the course of two separate nights in early June, when an unknown individual or group destroyed about 6,500 sugar beet plants genetically engineered to stand up to the herbicide Roundup on a pair of privately-owned plots of land leased and managed by Syngenta.

The first act of what the FBI considers "economic sabotage and a violation of federal law involving damage to commercial agricultural enterprises," took place during the night of June 8, when about 1,000 sugar beet plants on one property were destroyed. Three nights later, the destruction continued on another property, where another 5,500 plants were ruined. 

"It doesn't look like a vehicle was used. It looks like people entered the field and destroyed the plants by hand," said Paul Minehart, head of corporate communications in North America for Syngenta, a global agriculture corporation based in Basel, Switzerland.
Estimates for the damage were not specified but the financial losses are significant, according to FBI spokeswoman Beth Anne Steele.
A group, Oregonians for Food and Shelter, is offering a reward up to $10,000 for information leading to the identification, arrest and conviction of the culprits. 
Oregon Department of Agriculture Director Katy Coba issued a statement about the sabotage.
“To my knowledge, this is the first time someone has deliberately taken the cowardly step of uprooting high value plants growing in our state. Regardless of how one feels about biotechnology, there is no justification for committing these crimes and it is not the kind of behavior we expect to see in Oregon agriculture,” Coba said.
More than decade ago, environmental saboteurs vandalized experimental crops across the country in a revolt against high-tech agriculture.
Foes of genetic engineering also struck in 2000, when members of the Earth Liberation Front, with roots in Oregon, set fire to agriculture offices at Michigan State University. ELF's position was that genetic engineering was "one of the many threats to the natural world as we know it."
Have information about the destruction? Ring the local offices of the FBI at (541) 773-2942 during normal business hours or call the FBI in Portland anytime at (503) 224-4181

A couple more questions. 

Why is a Swiss agricultural corporation (Syngenta is another of the very evil corporate entities that are thriving in these thoroughly judaified early days of the 21st century) growing Monsanto's crap in rural Oregon? 

And what is 'Oregonians for Food and Shelter'? Why are these Oregonians offering up $10K of their own money to find the heroes  oops - culprits - no ...  may we say .... 'terrorists' who set fire to freaky plants? And, why is setting fire to freaky plants a federal crime? And, just since I'm a bit stoned and in a quizative frame of mind right now, what is NOT
a federal crime these days? (The last one's a question I've no hope of answering - not even the sychopath-in-charge, Eric Holder, can figure that one out). 

I'll not go into great detail here, but instead give you the broad overview of what Syngenta's all about. Formed 13 years ago, Syngenta has very close ties to Monsanto, and some of their business overlaps. According to wiki,
Syngenta is a large global Swiss specialized chemicals company which markets seeds and pesticides. Syngenta is involved in biotechnology and genomic research. The company was ranked third in total seeds & biotech sales in 2009 in the commercial market.[2]Sales in 2010 were approximately US$ 11.6 billion. Syngenta employs over 27,000 people in over 90 countries. Syngenta is listed on both the Swiss stock exchange and in New York. 

Syngenta is an amalgamation of Novartis and Zeneca. Novartis was formed when Geigy, Sandoz and Ciba merged at different times. Sandoz was the pharmacological lab that produced LSD, the drug our federal government was so eager to turn the world on to that they dosed the French town of Pont-Saint-Esprit one fine morning in 1951. The residents didn't seem to take too well to trippin' out - madness and death ensued and the outbreak was blamed on a local baker who must have baked a really funky batch of bread that early morning. I don't know what happened to the baker, but I can't imagine his business survived. Oh well.... have to break a few eggs and all that...

Oh, and why is this fine Swiss corporation growing these altered sugar beets in Oregon? Oh right - because it is against Swiss law to grow GMO crops on Swiss soil. 

And Oregonians for Food and Shelter? Aside from the fact that they came up with a goose-bump inducing name, OFFS really isn't about 'food and shelter' for the masses. Instead it represents corporate interests that just so happen to make a great deal of money cutting trees and growing crops and selling chemicals for business interests to spray on forests and farm and ranch lands. 

FORESTRY & WOOD PRODUCTS:


Eric Geyer, 2012 Chairman, Roseburg Forest Products

Jerry Anderson, Hancock Timber Resource Group

Luke Bergey, Miami Corporation
Ron Borisch, Longview Timber Corp.
Andy Bryant, Yamhill Environmental Services, Timber Division
Mike Fahey, Columbia Helicopters, Inc.
Jake Gibbs, Lone Rock Timber Management Company
David Hampton, Hampton Affiliates
Chris Jarmer, Oregon Forest Industries Council
Greg Miller, Weyerhaeuser Company
Ted Reiss, Seneca Jones Timber Company

AGRICULTURE & FOOD PROCESSORS:

Mark Dunn, 2012 Vice Chair J.R. Simplot Company
Barry Bushue, Oregon Farm Bureau
Jean Godfrey, Columbia Gorge Fruit Growers
Mike Iverson, Oregon Fresh Market Growers Association
Rick Jacobson, NORPAC Foods, Inc.
Jerry Marguth, Oregon Seed Council
Blake Rowe, Oregon Wheat Growers League
Carol Russell, Russell Cranberry Company
Craig Smith, Northwest Food Processors Association
Currently vacant Oregon Association of Nurseries

CHEMICAL, PROFESSIONAL APPLICATORS, ROW:

Doug Hoffman, 2012 Secretary WILCO – Winfield, LLC
Bruce Alber, Past Chair Wilbur-Ellis Company
Curt Dannen, Crop Production Services, Inc.
Mike Diamond, Monsanto Company
Debbie Ego, Rasmussen Spray Service
Danelle Farmer, Syngenta Crop Protection
Cindy Finlayson, Umatilla Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Jim Fitzgerald, Far West AgriBusiness Association
Jerry Harchenko, Pacific NW Aerial Applicators Alliance
Brendan McCarthy, Portland General Electric
Kent Pittard, DuPont
April Snell, Oregon Water Resources Congress
Bryan Stuart, Western Regional Alliance
Andrea Vogt, RISE

All those big names, I'd expect more than a measly $10K reward. Some of these old families have more than $10K in change lost under their couch cushions. 

But the real rub is this:

Syngenta and other growers of Sugar Beets in Southern Oregon are breaking laws and, so far, are not being held accountable: 

Biotech company violated USDA isolation requirements for GM sugar beet crops in Southern Oregon; USDA does nothing

Residents of Jackson County, Oregon have organized an initiative to ban the production of genetically modified plants in the county. Organizers of GMO-Free Jackson County have submitted a county ordinance and are collecting signatures with the aim of putting the initiative on the ballot for an election in 2013 or 2014. The initiative was launched in response to concerns that seeds for genetically modified Roundup Ready sugar beets were being grown in close proximity—and illegally—to producers of organic crops.

Illegal plantings all over the Rogue Valley

Last February, Chris Hardy, owner of Village Farm in Ashland, Oregon, discovered that a neighbor was growing GM sugar beet seeds just one-quarter of a mile from his small organic farm in Ashland, Oregon.
The neighbor was growing the beets under contract with biotechnology company Syngenta for seed production.
The problem was that his neighbor’s GM sugar beet plants could cross pollinate with—and contaminate—Hardy’s chard and table beet plants, ruining their organic status.
“I told him ‘are you serious?’” Hardy said. “I thought this was outrageous.”
Another even bigger problem was that the GM plantings violated US Department of Agriculture requirements, which call for a 4-mile separation distance between GM beets and other Beta seeds, which includes Swiss chard and table beets. From February 2011 until July 2012, GM sugar beets were partially deregulated by USDA and subject to the 4-mile separation distance.
Hardy contacted Syngenta about the violation and a company representative told him that there were other GM beet seed production fields throughout the Rogue Valley in Southern Oregon.
“He said there was a checkerboard of fields ranging in size from one-quarter to 10 acres being grown from South Ashland up to Grants Pass, a distance of about 25 miles,” Hardy said.
Hardy also contacted the USDA’s Animal Plant Health Inspection Service about Syngenta’s violation of the 4-mile buffer. The agency sent out an inspector who interviewed Hardy and several other farmers, but nothing resulted from it.
“Syngenta was very cavalier, hopscotching all over the valley,” said Brian Comnes, a retired computer project manager in Ashland and one of the organizers of the GMO-free initiative.
Another organic farmer, Steve Fry, owner of Fry Family Farms in Medford, was forced to destroy a chard crop because he found that a neighbor was growing GM sugar beets 400 yards from his farm. Fry was growing the chard for seed but his customer refused to buy the seed because he was concerned it had been contaminated by the GM beets.
“I can’t grow chard seed because the Syngenta guy is down the street,” Fry said. “Once GMOs are in town, everyone has to go away.”

Collecting signatures to put GMO ban on ballot

Following the discovery of the GM beets, Hardy called a meeting of farmers and citizens in Jackson County to alert them, and they organized GMO-Free Jackson County. In May, the group filed a proposed county ordinance that would make it illegal to grow GM plants in the county.
According to Comnes, the group has already collected the required 4662 signatures to get the ordinance on the ballot, but they aim to get more in case some signatures aren’t valid.
“We’d like to get 6500 by December 8 (the deadline to qualify for the next county election),” Comnes said, noting that the Ashland City Council also backs the initiative.
If they achieve that goal, Ordinance No. 635 would appear on the ballot for the next county election, which could be as early as March 2013 or as late as May 2014. If Jackson County voters pass the initiative, the ordinance would become law a year later, meaning it may not take effect until 2015.
Until then, Hardy says it’s a “crapshoot” for Rogue Valley farmers to grow organic chard and table beets because of the GMO contamination threat.
On top of that, in July USDA-APHIS completely deregulated GM sugar beets so the 4-mile isolation distance to protect chard and table beets is no longer a requirement.
If Jackson County voters pass Ordinance No. 635, the county would become the third in the US to pass a GMO ban, following Mendocino and Marin counties in California who passed similar laws in 2004.
- See more at: http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/november2012/illegalgmsugarbeetsoregon.php#sthash.hx5HghHv.dpuf

I did check, but so far I can find no evidence that our heroes at Oregonians for Food and Shelter have ponied up a $10K reward for information leading to the prosecution of Syngenta.... but now you know why hero(es) burned those god damned gmo'ed sugar beets in the first place. 

Unfortunately, though not surprisingly, the FBI hasn't yet published a toll-free number for folks to call to report GMO'ed crops being grown illegally in Oregon or any other American State. Perhaps they simply don't have the funds or manpower for such a costly and encompassing investigation... 


Sunday, June 2, 2013

12 Years After Experimental Planting of Monsanto's GMO Wheat; Altered Plants Have Returned To Life


If you travel just East of Mount Hood and the Cascades of far-North Oregon you'll encounter orchards. Cherry orchards, pear orchards and some grape and even the occasional peach orchard. Travel another 10 or so miles east and the air and soil dry considerably. And that's where Oregon's wheat ranches begin (don't dare to call them farms, not to one of the masonic families by whom most are owned. Many are old ranches passed down from generation to generation The money is in the land, not the grandchildren.

Monsanto created a number of varieties of genetically altered wheat and between 1998 and 2005 conducted small 'very rigorous' studies of the seeds in 16 states. 

When it was determined there was no market for GMO'ed wheat (neither Europe or Asia wanted anything to do with frankenwheat), Monsanto swears they then  'rigorously' culled the test seeds - burning them then burying them six feet deep in their grave. What they didn't burn and bury, Monsanto claims they carried back home to St. Louis. 
These are the good looking folk of Saint Louis. You ought to see the residents who volunteer for Monsanto's R&D

Yet, now 12 years after its last small test plantings in the Pacific Northwest, Monsanto's GMO seed has re-appeared - no - Risen from the Dead! But this isn't the judeo-Christian's promised rapturious return of Jesus (the guy in whom one half of those 'judeo-christians' presumably don't believe); no this appears as if it is a 'Night of the Living Dead' inspired Zombie Attack. 

And this Monsanto-scripted 'B' horror could cost Oregon alone as much as one half billion dollars in income from wheat usually exported to Asia and Europe. Should Monsanto's flick happen to play in other Western wheat growing states it will trim billions from America's exports. 

Should this seed find its way into Manitoba's and Alberta's wheat, the rest of the world may have no choice but to import GMO'ed wheat as the Western US and Western Canada export more wheat than the rest of the world combined. 

Maybe that's the real reason this 'burned and buried 6 feet deep' devil returned from its grave. 


Thanks Monsanto. Thanks Politicians and whores for Monsanto. The rest of us owe you one. 

Article below originated in the Oregonian.




Stunned researchers at Oregon State University couldn't help but question themselves. Once, twice, three times in early May -- in two different labs -- they analyzed DNA extracted from wheat plants grown on an eastern Oregon farm.
A farmer's attempt to kill the plants with weedkiller had failed, and a growing cadre of university and state agriculture officials wanted to know why. With each test, the result was the same: The wheat had been genetically modified to resist glyphosate, the key ingredient in the herbicide Roundup.
But that didn't make sense. The last Oregon test plantings of a "Roundup Ready" variety of wheat developed by Monsanto, which makes the herbicide, had ended 12 years before.
Genetically modified -- or GM -- wheat should not have been growing in that field. Or anywhere else, for that matter.
"This was a surprise to us," said Robert Zemetra, a wheat breeder at OSU's Crop and Soil Science Department. "We wanted to make sure we were not making a mistake.
"The importance of what was found was not lost on us."
Oregon's a hotbed for GMO fights
When it comes to controversies over genetically modified crops, Oregon has seen this fight before. And it's not just about wheat:
Canola -- Oregon has OK'd growing canola for food and renewable fuel in the Willamette Valley, despite objections from organic seed farmers. Among other worries, they fear genetically modified canola pollen will contaminate their organic broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower and Brussels sprouts seeds, which aren't supposed to contain genetic modifications. Oregon House Bill 2427 would ban canola planting in the valley pending Oregon State University studies.
Sugar beets and alfalfa -- Oregon farmers worried about cross pollination helped lead lawsuits against Roundup Ready sugar beets and alfalfa, designed to withstand the Monsanto herbicide. GM foes won some significant court victories, spurring new regulatory reviews, but plantings and legal battles continue. The Willamette Valley is nearly the sole supplier of U.S. sugar beet seeds.
Creeping bentgrass -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture fined The Scotts Co. $500,000 in 2007 after Roundup Ready bentgrass spread 13 miles away from field trials in Jefferson County. In 2010, an Oregon State University weed science professor discovered genetically engineered creeping bentgrass in irrigation ditches in eastern Oregon that traveled miles from test plots in Idaho. Scotts has pledged to eradicate the wayward plants.
--Scott Learn
It wasn't lost on economists, policymakers, federal regulators or other farmers, either. The discovery, announced last week, immediately re-ignited a fierce argument about the safety and wisdom of genetically tweaking American crops.Japan postponed a 25,000-ton order from a Portland grain shipper, and South Korea and the European Union quickly called for new testing of American wheat. An Oregon crop valued at $300 million to $500 million a year was suddenly in jeopardy.
Food safety advocates adopted a we-told-you-so stance: The genie is out of the bottle, genetically modified plants cannot be controlled and -- in addition to perhaps posing health risks -- they foul American exports to a world that doesn't want to eat "frankenfood."
"Nature finds a way," said George Kimbrell, an attorney with the Center for Food Safety in San Francisco, arguing that even the most carefully regulated plant studies can go wrong.
A 2005 study estimated that the wheat industry stands to lose $94 million to $272 million annually if GM wheat was introduced, according to the center. Markets that aren't comfortable with the idea of GM food will simply stop buying, or buy elsewhere.
Kimbrell said the Oregon wheat incident is a replay of 2006, when unapproved GM rice was found in a U.S. harvest. The European Union banned U.S. imports, rice prices plunged and Bayer CropScience, which developed and field-tested the rice, agreed to pay $750 million in damages to American farmers.
Monsanto may be liable for damages if Oregon wheat growers or shippers lose sales, Kimbrell said.
He and other critics say U.S. regulation of genetically modified crops is weak, with regulators relying on company data and inadequate monitoring of the plants' geographical spread, particularly after testing is complete. U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Oregon, is trying to repeal the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act," a rider attached to a stopgap funding bill in March that strips federal courts of the ability to require more safety review for some genetically modified seeds.
Monsanto downplays the Oregon incident. The company maintains there are no food, feed or environmental safety concerns associated with the "Roundup Ready" gene. The U.S. Department of Agriculture issued a similar statement.
The company tested glyphosate-resistant wheat in 16 states, including Oregon, from 1998 to 2005. The last Oregon trial was in 2001, according to the USDA, and Monsanto ultimately withdrew its application to have the GM variety approved after it became clear export markets didn't want it. The company said it closed the testing program in a "rigorous, well-documented and audited" process that should have left no modified plants or seed remaining.
"While (test results) are unexpected, there is considerable reason to believe that the presence of the Roundup Ready trait in wheat, if determined to be valid, is very limited," Monsanto said in a prepared statement.
Hiroshi Furusawa, Japan's consul general in Portland, said Friday that his country will need assurance that Oregon wheat is safe. Japan imported about 3 million tons of U.S. wheat last year. Soft white wheat grown in the Pacific Northwest and shipped out of Portland is primarily used to make noodles and crackers.
"In terms of food safety, we are meticulously concerned about what we eat," Furusawa said. "I don't know if it is within our DNA, but somehow we are very picky as to what we eat."
Some crop scientists, including Zemetra at OSU, say opposition to GM crops is often based on emotion rather than science. He believes the U.S. should not abandon efforts to manipulate food crops to meet changing conditions.
"With everything going on with climate change and the challenge of diseases and insect problems, and wide temperature swings, we're going need the ability to access all technology," he said.
Kimbrell said the industry makes similar claims, but so far has only produced crops modified to resist herbicides rather than climate change or drought conditions, for instance.

Nonetheless, Zemetra has unique insight into the work: He conducted one of Monsanto's GM wheat trials in 2000-01 when he worked at the University of Idaho.
"Very rigorous" protocols controlled the work at agricultural research stations, he said, which only deepens the mystery of how the GM wheat plants popped up in the Oregon field.
After the studies, GM seeds were burned, buried six feet underground or shipped back to Monsanto, he said. Wide "no-plant" areas were maintained around test sites to prevent pollen movement from the GM wheat to other crops. Testing sites were checked two years after the trials for the presence of "volunteer" wheat plants that might have popped up.
A "gene flow" study done by OSU in 2005 showed it is possible for genetic traits to transfer from one wheat plant to another -- through pollen, for example -- but it occurred at a very low rate and the maximum range appeared to be 120 feet, he said. In addition, the GM wheat being tested was a spring-planted variety, while the wheat found in the Oregon field was a winter variety.
"They don't flower at the same time," Zemetra said, making gene flow even more unlikely.
Accidental seed contamination is possible, but the questions of how and when may be impossible to answer, he said.
All of which spells trouble for future GM crops, Zemetra said.
"There's a lot of fear," he said. "And this isn't going to help, I can tell you that."